Jump to content

Proof that Conquests are better than Starions


ucw458
 Share

Recommended Posts

You're interpreting those results incorrectly. People search "Conquest" when they want information how to fix them, 6 million times. Starions never break down, so when they search for "Starions" they want to see how much faster they are.

 

-Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're interpreting those results incorrectly. People search "Conquest" when they want information how to fix them, 6 million times. Starions never break down, so when they search for "Starions" they want to see how much faster they are.

 

-Robert

 

 

Nope I'm right. Here's proof.

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=I%27m+right&word2=you+suck

 

 

Proof that widebodies are better

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=widebody&word2=flattie

 

And proof that 87s are better than 86s

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=86+starion&word2=87+conquest

 

 

 

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starions are the REAL DEAL. Conquests????? Most members who buy a Conquest do it because they can't find a STARION.....Sorry guys, all the good cars (Starions) are already owned. And NO, it is not for sale.

 

Bill

Edited by Caliber308
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every school boy knows Conquests are superior to Starions.

you just can't beat that conquest tsi decal on the back.

 

Oh, on a side note, there are some of you who like to put starion tail lights on quests. It just a tasteless thing to do. Stop the madness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True story in college in 1990 I had friends with a Conquest and one with a Starion. These clowns used to argue over which one was better all the time!

 

I used to settled it by saying both of your cars are trying to be the 944 Turbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...