Jump to content

More Iranian trash talk


83TechMaster
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I think I understand your point. That particular news network is nothing but propaganda to escalate the tension with Iran. Germany has no intention of taking action since a good portion of their economy relies on Iranian influence. Their already crippled economy would collapse if ties with Iran were severed. However, then the globalists would fund war manufacturing to help them with major conditions attached.

 

If Iran's testing is 'evidence of volatile behavior', then what should we call all of the drone attacks the 'coalition' is doing now in Yemen, and other countries? among many other atrocities we have committed over the last 100 years and counting.

 

Vote Ron Paul! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you, Tim. Paul is the only NON-globalist / world banker-backed candidate. All the others are globalist stooges.

 

Let's see, though, Iran should be scared. The administration is, currently, in ash-canistan, still have people in Iraq, we sent armed 'advisors' to that little oil-producing country of Uganda, and we went in to Libya and deposed one bad dude, and set up a worse government.

 

Now, we're trying to goad Iran into a war with us. This new guy in the white house sure is peace-loving. Oh wait, no he's not. He's all about the oil too. I wonder where all the anti-war protestors are? They must be on vacation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to focus on Our Affairs, Our people, Our Country, Our Future; we are far away from Iran. Let them talk sh88 and swim in it.

If Ahmadinejad or the likes of him should ever try to push their luck to attack us then they'll deserve bit of what they get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isolationist foreign policy is antiquated and fatally flawed. It would be nice if it would work, but it doesn't work, so it's pointless to suggest. The U.S. was regarded as "hiding in a world aflame" in the '30s as WWII ramped up. You don't get to be the LONE superpower on the planet and be isolationist. It's unethical, unrealistic and ignorant of about 5000 years of history. You have to understand where we came from to understand who we are today and why we engage in the conflicts we engage in. As general Van Riper puts it, if you're not intellectually 5000 years old, your opinion really doesn't count. This isn't to say that studying history can make you "like" the way things are, but it will make you understand the way things are, and it should make you understand that all of your current criticisms are thoroughly understood by decision makers. They just have better information than you do, so they don't have the option to enact the policies that seem so obvious from your outsider's perspective. Edited by chiplee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one said anything about isolationism, including Ron Paul.

 

Lol, just because he spins the truth and calls himself a "non-interventionist" doesn't mean he's not and isolationist. He is universally regarded as an isolationist because his foreign policy stance looks remarkably similar to isolationism. But either way, what is this if it's not isolationist?

 

"We need to focus on Our Affairs, Our people, Our Country, Our Future."

 

Focusing on global affairs is focusing on our affairs. That's just the world we live in.

Edited by chiplee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...