akauf

Audi s4. 2.7l v6 twin turbo, awd, 6 speed.

Trade for stage 3 2000 s4?

I want this. Need to sell my ls fc first. Any interest in trades? Swapped 240s or anything like that?

Denver, pa Its stock it is auto. I'll be bidding on a totaled 05 sti Monday. If it doesn't go cheap I'm going to just do the manual swap awhile. Point being, if someone really wants to trade, I'll make it manual and scratch the whole idea of an sti swap.

I recently traded my starion for this and I am looking to get back into a rwd. It is a 2001 Subaru 2.5rs. Runs good, motor and trans has 110k miles. In good shape in and out. Its auto but I can easily make it manual. I'm open to trades and out right sale so if you want it we can work something out. I'm in Denver, pa http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7104/7177165666_44f3da8301_z.jpg

I have a 99 2.5 rs I'd trade. I'll drive down and drive back or whatever

what suspension is that on

did you get the trans sorted out?

you already beat their charger, why'd you stop for the marked car? that's your problem

255s actually aren't meant to be used in e85 either though they last in it any way. The 400lph, also not recommended for e85,, has been having much less luck and failing often in ethanol. Most don't make it two months. Your friend will be replacing that pump in due time. The material the turbine is made from will break down in ethanol. In any event walboro won't warranty a pump used in e85.. Walboros work great in tank, the new 470 will work in e85,, be quite, and will be fine below a quarter tank. Easy, cheap, and functional

Walboro 400 isn't e85 compatible They are coming out with an e85 compatible 470lph pump in April. 044s are no good in tank in case u wanna go that route. You'll have the same problem you have now. You need to put in a decent lift pump in tank so I would just put in the new Wally pump when it comes out and be done. Simple and effective.

What gasket are you using?

I'm running a 50 trim on stock injectors and fuel pump and it is out of fuel before 10 psi. @ 8 psi on base wg pressure (no mbc) I can keep a safe afr to 6500

yes. t3 single scroll vs t4 divided in the examples. I've seen a couple that show the 1.06 ts t4 spooling a 62mm faster than a .82 ss t3 without losing top end. that is without pushing the limits on a new high end turbo. I'm mostly talking about results with the forced performance hta86. This turbo also doesnt spool much faster on a .63 t3 than it does with a .82 t3. When fully tapper the hta86 will make more power up top on a .82 ss t3 than is will on a 1.06 ts t4 I have a 50 trim on my starion now with a .63 t3 and I will be going to a .82 t3 I have laying around. All after I get my mega squirt in. I'll log boost and I'll bet the .82 will spool the same. this may only be relevent if you have full timing control but too much back pressure limits your timing. less back pressure (bigger hot side specifically) with more timing can increase your spool. Another thing to think about is that hitting a specific psi a few rpms faster doesn't mean anything for spool when you can make the same power on less boost with a larger hot side.

thats what I'm saying, too much volume is the problem most times. I missed that one part of your post. chad, idk what the reason is but I have seen a lot of comparisons between ss and ts and I can say that every time the 1.0 is losing boost and power big time while a .82 t3 is still holding strong. this is same everything except housing and manifold. the 1.06 seems to spool fast yet hold as much as the .82 t3. This is all based on the 68mm garrett turbine. only way to know is to run it, and watch your back pressure. Its pretty easy to switch housing latter.

then why did my precision on a vag 1.8t smoke with a -4 but it was not a probelm with a -3. Also why did the techs at precision, cts, forced fed, awd, etc. tell me to drop the feed line size to solve the oiling issue with the turbo? for that matter whats the difference between -4 and a .032 restricter for a gt if pressure is the only thing to consider. It is volume that is the issue. to great of a volume at a given pressure causes an issue with oil flow.

ss .64 t4 ~ ss .82 t3. A 1.06 divided t4 is somewhere in the vicinity of a t3 .82. at least as far as real world horsepower expectations go.

pro: its very accurate, serial logging con: you don't own it yet

Lol, don't sweat it man, just correcting it for potential buyers. 9 turbos are worth a good deal more because they're the only cores used for upgrades.

Yes, there are more overseas as well. I can link a list here later or start a new thread on info for stock and upgadeds stock housing turbos. I would love to make an adapter for these...

your title says evo 9, your description says 05 evo (8), and the turbo says tdo5hr-16g6-9.8t (03-04 evo 8). lol 03-04 Evo VIII - TD05HR-16G6-9.8T 05 Evo VIII - TD05HR-16G6-10.5T 06 Evo IX - TD05HR-16G6C-10.5T 06 IX MR - TD05HRA-155G6C-10.5T 08 Evo X GSR & MR - TD05HA-152G6-12T just giving you a heads up

bump from the dead to elaborate one thing I forgot to mention. When using the DOHC 4g64 timing belt you need to advance each cam gear by 3.75*... When using the 4g63 timing belt you retard each cam gear by 3.75*. Of course, time the came by the manufacturers specs but this will get you "zero'd out".

hahaha, amazing... anyway skullz summed it up well when he said it could be enough to allow the pump to aerate the oil. That wouldn't show up on an accurate gauge let alone stock and will damage bearings. the oil pump is driven by the engine and is 100% related to rpm. oil pressure and rpm will always have an exact linear correlation no matter the circumstances so long as your stuff works right. end of story.

I more than get what your getting at. its just not entirely true. if you did rev an engine with out load or a lot of throttle, or launch control etc. you wouldn't have lower oil pressure. engine rpm and oil pressure are directly related. Boost is just subject to a particular rpm band as well. turbo is driven by air flow and heat generation, its relationship to rpm is totally subjective to engine displacment, ve, timing fuel, etc. your oil pump is gear driven. its just a backwards way to say it. you may as well say oil pressure rises as battery voltage rises or injector dead increases. Even those two examples are more directly related and you wouldnt say it because its a weird way to word it. put on a 128mm turbo and see if your boost gauge rises with rpm... then what, you have no oil pressure??

whether you hold the car at 6k rpm with no load or 6k rpm at full load (full boost) the oil pressure is the same. oil pressure is dependent on rpm alone