Jump to content



240SX FI?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Seekerz

Seekerz

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 61 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Model:Conquest

Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:30 PM

Has anyone ever tried to modify and use the FI system from an 89-90 240sx? A buddy of mine has one from his old engine and i was curious if anyone had ever tried it.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Now I do realize that id be changing from a left side set up to a right but I figured id adapt the two manifolds together into one.
These are random Google images.

Edited by Seekerz, 24 April 2012 - 02:31 PM.

"If you could make god bleed, people will cease to believe in him. There will be blood in the water, and the sharks will come."

1988 Chrysler Conquest TSI

Posted Image






#2 Lance_S

Lance_S

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,091 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Michigan
  • Interests:Family, Church, Guns, Cars, Audio/Video
  • Model:Conquest

Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:45 PM

I can't imagine the hole pattern would bolt up.  Two different manufacturers.
Hardpipes, MAFT, GM MAS, 3" DP, 2.5" exhaust, 950/1050 Trilogy injectors, K&N filter, Machined and balance flywheel 23 lbs, short shift, 88/89 tranny, HD ACT clutch, DSM EVO3 S16g ported (21 psi), polished and clipped, NJV head (ported), larger SS Valves, Schneider springs, Ajusa HG, Adjustable FPR, MBC, BOV, MSD coil, Walbro 255, ABS, EGR and balance shaft elim, 88/89 ECU, UEGO 02, new or rebuilt everything.

My feedback:  http://www.starquest...howtopic=127993

#3 Seekerz

Seekerz

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 61 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Model:Conquest

Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:53 PM

ya i figured as much already. My line of thinking is cutting the two intakes and putting them together to make one that works.

"If you could make god bleed, people will cease to believe in him. There will be blood in the water, and the sharks will come."

1988 Chrysler Conquest TSI

Posted Image


#4 dmyers151

dmyers151

    Tactical Turtleneck

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6,897 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Monroe, NY
  • Interests:Toys & Candy
  • Model:Conquest

Posted 24 April 2012 - 03:04 PM

The intake manifold for an SR20 is a pretty close match.

#5 Seekerz

Seekerz

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 61 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Model:Conquest

Posted 24 April 2012 - 03:11 PM

Im trying to do this fairly cheap and my buddy wants to trade so i figured id ask if its possible lol

"If you could make god bleed, people will cease to believe in him. There will be blood in the water, and the sharks will come."

1988 Chrysler Conquest TSI

Posted Image


#6 Wakeman17

Wakeman17

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 264 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Orlando, FL
  • Model:Starion

Posted 30 August 2012 - 07:36 AM

couldn't hurt to try. If you do try let us know if it works ;)
Red 89 Conquest - Parting out (pm me)
Black 87 Starion - Being modded (Daily Driver)
Grey 87 Starion - not sure what to do with it yet
Don't Drink and Drive, Just Get High and Fly There.

#7 scott87star

scott87star

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,988 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston
  • Model:Starion

Posted 30 August 2012 - 08:07 AM

THIS is what you should make fit.

http://www.ebay.com/...&#ht_1559wt_825
Now selling true plug and play megasquirt!

I can upgrade your Fuel Injection Pro firmware

Performance Coatings!  Pistons, manifolds, bearings and more!

Visit my vendor forum at http://www.26liter.u...board,48.0.html

#8 SFBMX88

SFBMX88

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,359 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SAN FRANCISCO
  • Interests:WE LIKE THE MOON!!!!!
  • Model:Conquest

Posted 30 August 2012 - 07:06 PM

If you were going to run EFI parts off a KA24e, you could probably try the intake manifold off a Stanza or Axxess.  Throttle body would be on the correct side for the StarQuest.  Perhaps you could weld a G54B intake manifold flange onto it(assuming you get everything to line up).

Posted Image


Edited by SFBMX88, 30 August 2012 - 07:08 PM.

Posted Image

#9 TexasQuest

TexasQuest

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,630 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunnyvale, Texas
  • Interests:Tsi's & VR4's
  • Model:Conquest

Posted 01 September 2012 - 12:04 PM

^ Bingo. Seeing these at my work from time to time (nissan tech) I've wondered the same thing. Hell the 2.2 mazda intake has been used before....
88 Fiji Blue-Tsi
Zoom clutch, Fidanza flywheel, Stedebani shifter, KYB's, ST springs, abs delete, a/c delete, TEP steel brake lines, LSP braided cooler lines, MK1 silicone hoses, hard pipes, Turbo XS RFL bov, *DM 3" exhaust, TEP front & rear strut bars, SHP's
Posted Image

View PostJohnnyWadd, on 04 March 2010 - 10:01 PM, said:

my shaft was big i dont know what your talking about.

#10 Seekerz

Seekerz

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 61 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Model:Conquest

Posted 08 September 2012 - 04:39 PM

welp i scrapped the idea due to a fire and melted 240sx manifold <_<

"If you could make god bleed, people will cease to believe in him. There will be blood in the water, and the sharks will come."

1988 Chrysler Conquest TSI

Posted Image


#11 ESIrType?

ESIrType?

    Established Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,063 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Charlotte, Nc
  • Interests:Cheese, sloth fighting and bigfoot!
  • Model:Other

Posted 16 September 2012 - 08:33 PM

Go for it! It's a fun project! But don't be disappointed if it doesn't work. I am not trying to be a downer. When I first did the Mazda 2.2 intake conversion with an adapter plate years ago, I didn't know if it would work. No one had done it yet. I did a lot of measuring and research. I was still mentally prepared to fail. In the end it worked out and was a really fun project and was cool to do something different and new that the community could also benefit from. I will say, if I had to do it again I would simply build an intake. I would have had much less time into building an intake than making another on work.

Good luck,
Shawn
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users