Jump to content

How much tunnel work to fit a T-56 in a manual ?


AustinTSI
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have read of several people that have swapped a T-56 into a Starion on several sites including this one. But the other day I read a post on this site saying that the T-56 won't fit in the manual transmission body even using a sledge hammer to make room.

 

So my question is, with regard to the manual transmission tunnel, how much work has to be done to make a T-56 fit? Is it just an issue that the LS-1 (long input shaft) won't fit and the LT-1 (short input shaft) fits when a hammer is used?

 

Or is there some other issues?

 

Thankx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only option is to cut out the floor and weld in a new one. long shaft or short shaft. Theres no way in hell the short shaft is narrow or short enough to fit in. I have the long shaft, but its the same casing basically so theres not going to be any room found by going to the short shaft.

 

It doesn't fit, Period.

Edited by TsTKl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the long shaft I had to cut the tunnel and raise it by welding in a two inch spacer and tapering it down. Even with that modification it still a tight fit. The black rubber isolator at top center of tranny touch the top of the tunnel to have it sit straight with the engine. I am using a internal hydraulic bearing and everytime I have to replce it I have to pull the engine and tranny. PIDA!!! to replace.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

cutting/welding is BS :( I got mine to fit with twenty mnutes of slowly masaging the pass side ot the tuunel, it needs to move over undder a half inch in just one spot, this is easy hammer work.

 

been there - done that, put the cutter away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Why the disagreements on this? Is there a special way to install & pull it?

 

 

Because the two that said it wont fit both swapped in different motors so it doesn't really apply to the original posters question of putting a t56 in a starion with a g54b, I would take Chads word on it as he is the one who helped design the g54b-t56 flywheel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Because the two that said it wont fit both swapped in different motors so it doesn't really apply to the original posters question of putting a t56 in a starion with a g54b, I would take Chads word on it as he is the one who helped design the g54b-t56 flywheel

 

Scotty is correct...And Chad...Its the same reason the r154 needs more "tunnel mods" on the 1jz/2jz swaps than it does in a g54b car...The ls1 is 5mm from the firewall and the g54b is not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

 

 

Because the two that said it wont fit both swapped in different motors so it doesn't really apply to the original posters question of putting a t56 in a starion with a g54b, I would take Chads word on it as he is the one who helped design the g54b-t56 flywheel

 

I used two stock motor mounts with a 4g63, so it should be "roughly" the same location as the g54b. Either way the transmission wouldn't fit without being moved almost a foot forward. The biggest problem is the overall height of the transmission. You would have to make a custom k-member and lower the engine/transmission in order to make it fit, I would HATE doing that because then every time you bottom out, your hitting your transmission first, even before your exhaust.

 

cutting/welding is BS :( I got mine to fit with twenty mnutes of slowly masaging the pass side ot the tuunel, it needs to move over undder a half inch in just one spot, this is easy hammer work.

 

been there - done that, put the cutter away.

 

I refuse to believe this without seeing it in person. Do you have pictures to back these statements up? I took a full sized sledge hammer to my tunnel for almost 12 hours straight. I locked myself in the shop and ended up being there for 3 days straight working on my car. I wanted there to be ANY option other than welding. I used an air hammer, sledge, mini sledge, hydraulic body bender, everything I could think of. The sawzall ended up being the ONLY fix.

 

Good stuff here anyone have detailed pics or any other good wright ups with pics other then convette and boosted88tsi?

 

you can look at my build thread on here or at projectzerog.com

 

I would estimate that you need at least 2 inches on each side, and almost 4 inches above it. This is including having access to the reverse lights sensor, vss, and reverse lockout switch, but excluding the second gear lockout switch. If I had wanted to keep that it would have been even more work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must have done somethign wrong man. I'll have to dig up pics, that was 8 years ago. From scratch, not knowing what needed to be move nor how much, I was done in 2 hours (not all at once), includign many mountings/dismountings of the transmission to be sure I was satisfied. the transmittion belly sits aobut 1/2" lower than the front K-member, using stock motor mounts. It could sit up 1/2"-3/4" higher, but I didn't want to hear the transmission bump the tunnel. the exhaust was sitting quite a bit lower than the trans, so no worrys about bottoming out.

 

I didn't hook up the reverse lock out, VSS (will convert to a manual adapter), or CAGS switch. I also cut off unnecessary casting tabs from the outside of the case. Perhaps that's your problem?

 

Several others have done this with the same level of effort as well, so my car was no fluke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://webpages.charter.net/catsamuel/DCP00790.JPG

 

Here is a pic from the rear. the trans K member is aluminum, and the belly of the trans can be seen sitting just below it (about 3/4"). the belly of the trans is about 4" off the ground, and my car is way lowered. You'll see there is no exhaust in this pic, I coverted to exit exhaust for better ground clearance. If it were there, youl'd see it woudl sit quite a bit lower.

 

Proof? that K member bracket is 2" angle, so the bottom of the bracket is 2" below the floor pan where the trans K-member mounts, which is abotu 1-1/2" higher than the frame rails. So with the 3/4" of the trans droop below the K-member + the 2" height of the K-member = 2-3/4" from the floor pan to the trans belly. 1-1/2" from the floor pan to the bottom of the frame rails to the 2-3/4" of the trans belly = trans sits 1-1/4" below the frame rails, that's about where the stock exhaust sits. LIke I said, you can mount it higher if you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was home on my lunch break todayand I peeked under the car : I was wrong. the frame rails come down 2", not 1-1/2", and the belly of the trans is only 3/4" below the frame rails at it's lowest point.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

can you get pictures with your car up on a rack? did you use a t5 or something? i removed some tabs as well (they look like mounting tabs but really are there to protect the electrical connections). i still dont know how on earth you did it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 speed Borg-warner (pre-Tremec) T56, trust me, it goes into 6th and brings the RMP's down to about 2000 at 80 MPH. :) .

 

It's not going on a rack any time soon. I broke my back 5 montsh ago and working on cars isn't priority right now. I'll see if I can snap a cell phone pic of it in my driveway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In another post that I started about T56 options SPEEDSTAR had this to say:

I remember Chad saying that 93 to 97 t56 put the shifter in the stock location , maybe an inch or so off , which way I not sure,its supposed to be as good a fit as can be had...Jeff

 

I had also posted this pdf on some T56 measurements http://www.austincs.com/car/T56InstallationDimensions.pdf

 

I'm thinking that the problems TsTKI had has to be related to the specific model he used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the specific model I used looked identical to the later model year version jason used. He also had similar problems. Chad what year was your transmission out of? If I remember correctly mine was a 98 and jasons was a 2000. I remember speaking to others about size and hearing that the casing was almost identical bewteen all years, including long and short shaft. The biggest differences occured when looking at cobra vs. F body. The viper is more similar to the f-body than the cobra. I've never seen one of the ones out of the aston martin and the corvette is a rear transmission car so it can't be easily used.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one I used and the one my kit was designed for was the 93-97 for the TL-1 motor. Mine is a 95 if I recall.

 

98+ is the LS1 version. DIfferent midplate and bell with a longer input shaft, but I thought the case was the same. I have an LS1 trans in my shot (I was palnning making a kit for that as well) but I don't recall any obvious external differences in the case. I think the tail shaft housing is slightly different too, but pretty close.

 

If you used an LS1, I have no idea how it fits since I never tried to fit my ls1 T56. The LT1 just fits so well, I never had cause to try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the link to Chad's orignal GP for the kit. It has the pictures still there as well with his T56 Tranny installed. I knew right where to look because I was interested in his kit back in 2007 when he originally did this swap. proof is in the pudding.

 

http://www.starquestclub.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=24651

Link to comment
Share on other sites

based on those pictures I'd say chad's transmission is sitting about 2-4 inches lower than mine is. We have the same tranny mount though it looks like, lol.

 

chads:

http://www.nwstarquest.com/Dcp00726.jpg

 

mine:

http://s81.photobucket.com/albums/j223/tstkl/conquest/motor/?action=view&current=DSC_0971.jpg

 

I ended up lowering from this position about 1/2 an inch. But this is where the driveshaft appeared to be at the correct angle (3-5 degrees).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

based on those pictures I'd say chad's transmission is sitting about 2-4 inches lower than mine is. We have the same tranny mount though it looks like, lol.

 

chads:

http://www.nwstarque...om/Dcp00726.jpg

 

mine:

http://s81.photobuck...nt=DSC_0971.jpg

 

I ended up lowering from this position about 1/2 an inch. But this is where the driveshaft appeared to be at the correct angle (3-5 degrees).

 

Am I missing something, or does this pic of Chad's not have the mount installed? It looks like it's half installed & sitting on a red jack, which would explain it being lower. You prob. meant to link to a diff pic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...