member/street car detailed on this site gone 10.48 using the "lousy oe cam". 400
ft-lbs tq, without spray. Wanna explain this 'problem' you see ?
that would seem like more of a 'problem' to me, if ya gonna make claims.
The faster cars put forth that considerable effort testing parts to come up with the
numbers they do.... reverting to stock cam after direct comparisons, same setup.
"Feels great", "being happy", etc. is all good, but useful only to the beholder.
Can't be measured, and it has no bearing on a cars ability to accelerate.
Doesn't communicate anything at all to we 'observers' = useless. No yardstick.
Promoting any 'performance cam', should be done on its own merit (perf numbers).
To constantly "belittle"(or discredit) the oe cam, *despite its' proven capability*,
is plain ignorant imo.
Some of us are happy with our Roller set ups. If your happy with the stock cam that's fine too. Some of us that run Roller set ups don't need "numbers" to prove anything. Like I said before: "I don't need a dyno to tell me what I feel" and it's not "ignorance". We all know our own cars, what works for one engine set up and modifications might not be the best for another
Edited by Caliber308, 10 November 2008 - 10:05 PM.